Paramount and the States Suing to Kill Its $111 Billion Warner Bros. Deal Are Finally Talking
Paramount Skydance and the twelve state attorneys general suing to block its $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery are set to meet Monday for settlement talks, a court-ordered mediation session that California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office confirmed is moving forward. The lawsuit, led by Bonta and filed in July, argues the merger “will mean higher costs, less competition, lower wages, job cuts, and fewer movies and TV shows,” and Bonta says Paramount has so far refused to offer the structural remedies the states are demanding [1, 2, 3]. The deal has been frozen pending a March 2 trial in federal court in Oakland, and under the merger agreement CEO David Ellison must pay WBD shareholders a 25-cent-per-share “ticking fee” starting October 1 — roughly $7 million a day, or $650 million a quarter, until the deal closes or hits its final June 4, 2027 deadline [4, 5]. Paramount has separately asked a judge to force the state AGs and the Writers Guild of America to post a $1.88 billion bond to cover the financing costs the delay is racking up [4, 5]. California Governor Gavin Newsom, asked about the standoff, said “there’s some universal sentiment” toward a resolution but that “the best deal… has to be worked through” [1].
Why It Sucks:
Paramount Skydance
- The clock is bleeding money daily. Once October 1 hits, Paramount owes WBD shareholders roughly $7 million a day just for the deal being stuck in limbo, a cost that keeps compounding the longer litigation drags on [4, 5].
- States won’t take a real offer. Bonta himself says Paramount has been unwilling to meet the states’ terms, but from the company’s side those “structural remedies” could mean carving up a deal that took years to negotiate [2].
- A trial looms even with talks underway. Monday’s mediation doesn’t pause the March 2 Oakland trial date, so Paramount has to negotiate and litigate at the same time [1, 5].
State Attorneys General
- Paramount wants them to bankroll its own delay. The company is asking a court to force the very states suing to stop the merger to post a $1.88 billion bond covering Paramount’s financing costs [4, 5].
- Consolidation risk isn’t hypothetical to them. Bonta’s office argues the combined company means “higher costs, less competition, lower wages, job cuts, and fewer movies and TV shows” for the industry and consumers they represent [2].
- Settling looks like capitulation either way. Bonta says he prefers resolving disputes “in the boardroom, not the courtroom,” but agreeing to any deal that doesn’t include real structural changes risks the states looking like they folded on their own antitrust case [1, 2].
Writers Guild of America
- The union got dragged into a bond fight it didn’t start. Paramount’s $1.88 billion bond request names the WGA alongside the twelve states, meaning a union representing working writers could be on the hook for a mega-merger’s financing costs [4, 5].
- Its own warnings about job losses get treated as a liability. The WGA joined the effort to block the merger over fears of consolidated bargaining power and fewer buyers for scripts, yet now faces being billed for slowing down the deal it opposes on its members’ behalf [4, 5].
- A settlement between Paramount and the states could sideline them. Monday’s talks are between Paramount and the state AGs — the WGA has no seat at that table even though its bond exposure is part of what’s being negotiated around [1, 4].
Sources & Citations:
[1] Deadline: Paramount, State AGs Set Settlement Talks On Antitrust Suit; Newsom Talks Merger
[2] Variety: Paramount and State A.G. to Meet Monday to Discuss Settlement of Antitrust Case
[3] CNBC: Paramount, California AG Office Reportedly Plan to Meet Monday to Discuss Settling WBD Lawsuit
[4] Deadline: Paramount Demands $1.8B From AGs For Costs Of Antitrust Suit Over WBD Merger
[5] Variety: Paramount Requests $1.9 Billion Bond, Other Costs From States Suing Over Warner Bros. Merger